Sunday 31 March 2024

Film Screening : The Birthday Party

                     


Greetings!! Everyone This blog is a part of thinking activity task on The Birthday Party Play by Harold Pinter; given by Megha Ma'am Trivedi
For more information regarding this task CLICK HERE
 

# Pre Viewing Task:-

1. Harold Pinter:-


2.   Comedy of Menace: Whose plays are known so? Who termed it? What are its peculiar characteristics? How is it different from Absurd Theatre?


>> The term "Comedy of Menace" was coined by the French dramatist and playwright Ionesco to describe the works of certain playwrights, including his own plays. The plays that fall under the category of Comedy of Menace are known for their distinctive characteristics, which set them apart from the genre of Absurd Theatre, although there are some overlapping elements.

  The playwrights whose works are considered as Comedies of Menace include:

  1. Harold Pinter: He is widely regarded as the pioneer and most prominent figure of the Comedy of Menace genre. His plays, such as "The Birthday Party," "The Caretaker," and "The Homecoming," exemplify the characteristics of this genre.

  2. N.F. Simpson: His plays, such as "A Resounding Tinkle" and "One Way Pendulum," are also considered to be part of the Comedy of Menace genre.

   3. Edward Albee: Some of Albee's plays, like "The American Dream" and "The Sandbox," exhibit elements of the Comedy of Menace.

 The peculiar characteristics of the Comedy of Menace include:

   1. Underlying Menace: The plays create a sense of impending danger or threat, often through the use of ambiguous language, power dynamics, and subtle violence.

2. Everyday Settings: The plays are typically set in ordinary, domestic environments, which heightens the sense of unease and menace.

3. Psychological Tension: The characters often experience psychological discomfort, anxiety, and a sense of being trapped or confined, both physically and metaphorically.

4. Power Struggles: The plays frequently explore power dynamics and the manipulation of language to assert dominance or control over others.

5. Ambiguity: The plays are characterized by ambiguity in terms of language, motivation, and meaning, leaving the audience to interpret and fill in the gaps.
 
  While the Comedy of Menace and Absurd Theatre share some similarities, such as the use of ambiguity and the exploration of existential themes, there are distinct differences between the two:

   1. Absurd Theatre often portrays a more explicitly irrational and illogical world, while the Comedy of Menace maintains a semblance of realism and familiarity.

   2. Absurd Theatre often employs more overt forms of nonsense and surrealism, whereas the Comedy of Menace relies on subtle, psychological tension and undercurrents of menace.

  3. Absurd Theatre frequently questions the very nature of language and communication, while the Comedy of Menace focuses more on the manipulation of language as a tool for power and control.

      In essence, while both genres explore existential themes and the breakdown of conventional forms, the Comedy of Menace maintains a stronger connection to the recognizable, everyday world, making its menace all the more unsettling and poignant.

    3.  Explain ‘Pinteresque’ – Pinter pause and use of ‘Silence’ in the play: a particular atmosphere and environment in drama.



>> Harold Pinter, a renowned British playwright, was known for his distinctive style that involved the strategic use of pauses, silences, and subtext within his plays. The term "Pinteresque" refers to the unique atmosphere and environment that Pinter created through his writing, which was characterized by a sense of ambiguity, tension, and unspoken undercurrents.

  The "Pinter pause" or the use of silence in his plays was a deliberate technique employed by the playwright to create a particular mood and convey underlying meanings. These pauses were not merely empty spaces or gaps in dialogue; rather, they were pregnant with unspoken thoughts, emotions, and implications. The silences allowed for the audience to fill in the blanks, interpret the subtext, and grasp the deeper layers of meaning beneath the surface.

>>Pinter's use of silence served several purposes:

1. Psychological tension: The pauses and silences created a heightened sense of tension and unease, adding to the overall atmosphere of suspense and uncertainty. The audience was left to contemplate the unsaid, and this psychological tension kept them engaged and invested in the characters' dynamics.

2. Subtext and ambiguity: The silences allowed for ambiguity and multiple interpretations. Pinter believed that language was often inadequate in conveying the complexities of human experience, and the pauses provided space for the unspoken subtext to emerge. The audience was encouraged to read between the lines and draw their own conclusions about the characters' motivations and underlying emotions.

3. Power dynamics: The use of silence often reflected power dynamics between characters. In some instances, one character's silence could indicate submission or lack of control, while another character's ability to command silence could symbolize dominance or authority.

4. Realism: Pinter aimed to capture the rhythms and nuances of everyday speech, including the pauses, hesitations, and silences that occur in real-life conversations. This lent a sense of realism and authenticity to his plays, as the silences mirrored the natural ebb and flow of human communication.

  The "Pinteresque" atmosphere and environment in his plays were characterized by this strategic use of silence, combined with understated dialogue, subtle gestures, and an overall sense of mystery and ambiguity. Pinter's plays often explored themes of communication breakdown, power struggles, and the complexities of human relationships, and the silences played a crucial role in conveying these underlying themes and creating a unique theatrical experience for the audience. 



4.‘The Birthday Party’ – an allegory of ‘artist in exile and other interpretations.


>> Harold Pinter's play "The Birthday Party" has been subject to various interpretations and analyses, with one prominent reading being an allegory of the artist in exile. This interpretation explores the notion of the artist's struggle for creative freedom and the external forces that seek to suppress or control their artistic expression.

 The central character, Stanley Webber, can be seen as representing the artist figure. He is a reclusive boarder living in a seaside boarding house, seemingly detached from the outside world and immersed in his own inner world. His solitary existence and apparent withdrawal from society can be interpreted as a metaphor for the artist's self-imposed exile, a necessary retreat to nurture their creative process and maintain artistic integrity.

 The arrival of the two menacing strangers, Goldberg and McCann, can symbolize the external forces that threaten the artist's freedom and autonomy. These forces may represent societal pressures, political oppression, or even the artist's own inner demons that seek to stifle their creative expression. The interrogation and psychological torture inflicted upon Stanley by Goldberg and McCann can be seen as an allegory for the artist's struggle against external forces that aim to control, censor, or conformity.

 Furthermore, the play's title, "The Birthday Party," can be interpreted as a metaphor for the artist's creative rebirth or the emergence of a new artistic vision. The party itself, with its chaotic and surreal elements, can represent the tumultuous and transformative process that the artist must endure to achieve artistic freedom and self-realization.

> Other interpretations of the play include:

1. Existential themes: The play can be seen as an exploration of existential themes such as the human condition, the search for meaning, and the absurdity of existence. Stanley's isolation, the meaningless rituals, and the lack of clear motivations can be viewed through an existential lens.

2. Power dynamics and oppression: The play can be interpreted as a commentary on power dynamics and the oppression of individuals by authoritarian forces. Goldberg and McCann's interrogation and control over Stanley can symbolize the subjugation of individual freedom by oppressive systems.

3. Psychological analysis: The play lends itself to psychological interpretations, with Stanley's mental state and the relationships between characters being subject to analysis through various psychological frameworks, such as the Freudian or Jungian perspectives.

  While the interpretation of "The Birthday Party" as an allegory of the artist in exile is a prominent and compelling reading, the play's richness and complexity allow for multiple interpretations, reflecting the ambiguity and depth that characterize Pinter's work.


5.  ‘The Birthday Party’ as a Political Play with reference to Harold Pinter’s Noble Speech: ‘Art, Truth & Politics




>> Harold Pinter's "The Birthday Party" can be interpreted as a political play that explores themes of power, oppression, and the relationship between art, truth, and politics. This interpretation finds support in Pinter's Nobel Prize acceptance speech, titled "Art, Truth & Politics," where he articulated his views on the interplay between these concepts.

  In his speech, Pinter argued that the pursuit of truth is an inherent duty of the artist, and that this pursuit often clashes with the political establishment's desire to obscure or manipulate truth for its own interests. He stated, "The real truth is that there never is any such thing as one truth to be found and having found it we will be subjugated by it." This sentiment is reflected in "The Birthday Party," where the characters Goldberg and McCann represent the forces of power and authority that seek to subjugate and control Stanley, the central character who can be seen as a metaphor for the artist figure.

 The interrogation and psychological torture inflicted upon Stanley by Goldberg and McCann can be interpreted as a symbolic representation of the oppressive tactics employed by political regimes to silence dissenting voices and suppress artistic expression that challenges the official narrative or status quo. Pinter's speech emphasized the artist's responsibility to resist such oppression and to "remake the world" through their art, stating, "It is a subject for the gravest historical responsibility that so many writers have accepted the deformation of truth."

  Furthermore, the surreal and absurd elements in "The Birthday Party" can be seen as Pinter's way of exposing the absurdity and contradictions inherent in political systems that claim to uphold truth and justice while engaging in deception and oppression. The play's ambiguity and lack of clear motivations can be interpreted as a reflection of the often murky and obfuscated nature of political power dynamics.

  In his speech, Pinter also spoke about the role of language in obscuring truth, stating, "So long as language continues to be employed in order to conceal, distort, or manipulate the truth, so long will it remain the servant of oppression and obscurantism." This resonates with the play's use of language, where silences, pauses, and subtext take on significant meaning, highlighting the inadequacy of language to convey the full truth and the necessity of reading between the lines to uncover underlying meanings.

  By examining "The Birthday Party" through the lens of Pinter's Nobel speech, the play can be seen as a powerful political work that challenges the audience to confront the suppression of artistic freedom, the manipulation of truth by those in power, and the artist's responsibility to resist such oppression through their art. Pinter's speech provides a framework for understanding the play as a commentary on the complex relationship between art, truth, and politics, and the artist's role in navigating these intersecting realms.



# While Viewing:-

1. A comparison of the film and play versions of ‘The Birthday Party’ affords us a rare opportunity to gain insight into how a reconception of a play into film may affect the dramatic experience it communicates. Mark the way Pinter treats the texture of the play.

>> Harold Pinter's "The Birthday Party" is a seminal work in both theater and film, offering a compelling exploration of themes such as identity, power dynamics, and the nature of reality. When comparing the film and play versions, one can discern significant differences in how Pinter treats the texture of the narrative, characters, and overall atmosphere. Here's a breakdown of key elements:

1. Dialogue and Silence: Pinter's trademark use of dialogue and silence plays a crucial role in both the play and film. In the play, the dialogue is often sparse, with long pauses and ambiguous exchanges, creating a sense of unease and tension. In the film adaptation, Pinter retains this characteristic style, utilizing close-ups and subtle gestures to convey meaning in moments of silence.

2. Setting and Atmosphere: The play's setting primarily revolves around the confined space of a boarding house, intensifying the sense of claustrophobia and isolation. Pinter's use of sparse, minimalist stage directions allows for interpretation and imagination. In contrast, the film adaptation may expand on the setting, offering visual cues and atmospheric details that enhance the audience's immersion into the world of the story.

3. Character Dynamics:- Pinter's characters often exist in a state of ambiguity, with their motivations and backgrounds left open to interpretation. In both the play and film, the characters' relationships are marked by tension, manipulation, and power struggles. However, the visual medium of film may allow for subtler nuances in facial expressions and body language, offering deeper insight into the characters' inner workings.

4. Narrative Structure:- Pinter's non-linear narrative style is a hallmark of his work, challenging conventional storytelling conventions. In "The Birthday Party," the narrative unfolds gradually, revealing layers of meaning and ambiguity. While the play may rely on dialogue and action to convey its narrative, the film adaptation can utilize editing techniques, cinematography, and sound design to enhance the storytelling experience.

  Overall, Pinter's treatment of the texture of "The Birthday Party" remains consistent across both the play and film versions, with a focus on ambiguity, tension, and psychological depth. However, the transition from stage to screen allows for different avenues of expression, offering audiences a unique perspective on Pinter's provocative exploration of human relationships and existential angst.


2. Observe how Pinter gives us the texture-the sounds and sights of a world without structure, which is the heart and soul of the play also.

>> Harold Pinter, known for his distinctive style of theatre often termed "Pinteresque," excels in creating atmospheres where the absence of clear structure dominates. This lack of structure isn't merely a narrative device but rather a thematic exploration that delves into the complexities of human interaction and the underlying tensions beneath seemingly ordinary situations.

  In Pinter's plays, including classics like "The Birthday Party" and "The Caretaker," the texture of the world he presents is rich with ambiguity, creating an unsettling yet captivating experience for the audience. Here's how he achieves this:

1. Sparse Dialogue: Pinter's dialogue is marked by pauses, repetitions, and non-sequiturs, which mimic the disjointed nature of human conversation. These verbal exchanges often carry layers of meaning, leaving much unsaid and open to interpretation.

2. Atmospheric Stage Directions: Pinter pays meticulous attention to stage directions, incorporating sounds and sights that contribute to the overall mood of the play. These details, such as the ticking of a clock or the flickering of a light, add to the sense of unease and disorientation.

3. Ambiguous Characters: Pinter's characters are often enigmatic, with their motivations and intentions shrouded in mystery. This ambiguity allows for multiple interpretations and invites the audience to engage actively in deciphering the dynamics at play.

4. Underlying Threat: Despite the seemingly mundane settings, there's often an undercurrent of menace in Pinter's works. This sense of threat contributes to the atmosphere of tension and unpredictability, keeping the audience on edge.

5. Symbolism and Metaphor: Pinter frequently employs symbolism and metaphor to convey deeper themes and ideas. Objects and actions take on symbolic significance, adding another layer of complexity to the narrative.

 By weaving together these elements, Pinter creates a world that feels both familiar and surreal, where the absence of structure mirrors the chaos and uncertainty of human existence. This texture not only serves as the backdrop for his plays but also forms the very heart and soul of his distinctive theatrical vision.


3. How many times the ‘knocking at the door’ happens in the play? Is it creating menacing effect while viewing the movie?


>> In Harold Pinter's play "The Birthday Party," the knocking at the door motif is a recurring element, but the exact number of times it occurs can vary depending on the interpretation of the director and the production. In the original text, the knocking is a significant motif, used to create tension and uncertainty throughout the play.

 As for its effect on creating a menacing atmosphere in a movie adaptation, it largely depends on the director's interpretation, cinematography, sound design, and overall atmosphere of the film. The knocking can certainly contribute to a sense of unease, suspense, and mystery, especially if utilized effectively within the visual and auditory elements of the movie. However, its impact ultimately depends on how well it is integrated into the film's overall narrative and tone.


4. How are ‘silences’ and ‘pauses’ used in the movie to give effect of lurking danger – how it helps in building the texture of comedy of menace.



>> "The Birthday Party" is a play written by Harold Pinter, known for its themes of ambiguity, paranoia, and psychological tension. The concept of "comedy of menace" refers to Pinter's unique blend of dark humor and underlying threat. In the context of the play, silences and pauses play a crucial role in creating an atmosphere of lurking danger and contribute to the texture of comedy of menace in several ways:

1. Tension and Suspense: Pinter's masterful use of silence and pauses creates a palpable sense of tension and suspense. The audience becomes acutely aware of the unsaid, the unspoken, and the underlying tension between the characters. These moments of silence hang heavy in the air, heightening the audience's anticipation and sense of foreboding.

2. Ambiguity and Uncertainty: The use of silences and pauses introduces ambiguity and uncertainty into the dialogue. Characters may hesitate or falter in their speech, leaving their intentions and motivations open to interpretation. This ambiguity adds to the sense of unease and contributes to the overall atmosphere of menace.

3. Power Dynamics: Silence can also be used as a tool to assert power dynamics between characters. A prolonged silence can be an assertion of dominance or a passive-aggressive tactic employed by one character to unnerve another. These power struggles contribute to the underlying tension and conflict within the play.

4. Symbolism and Subtext: Silences and pauses can be laden with symbolism and subtext, conveying emotions, desires, and fears that cannot be expressed through words alone. The unspoken tensions simmer beneath the surface, waiting to erupt at any moment. This layer of subtext adds depth to the characters and situations, enriching the overall texture of the comedy of menace.

5. Comic Timing: In Pinter's comedy of menace, the juxtaposition of dark themes with moments of humor relies heavily on impeccable timing. Silences and pauses serve as comedic beats, punctuating the dialogue and allowing the audience to absorb the absurdity of the situation. The contrast between the dark undertones and the moments of levity enhances the comedic effect, creating a unique and unsettling comedic experience.

  In summary, silences and pauses in "The Birthday Party" contribute to the atmosphere of lurking danger by building tension, introducing ambiguity, defining power dynamics, conveying symbolism and subtext, and enhancing comic timing. Through their strategic use of silence, Pinter creates a richly textured comedy of menace that keeps audiences on the edge of their seats.


5.  Comment upon the use of things like mirror, toy drum, newspapers, breakfast, chairs, window-hatch etc in the movie. What sort of symbolic reading can you give to these objects?

>> In Harold Pinter's play "The Birthday Party," the use of everyday objects like mirrors, toy drums, newspapers, breakfast items, chairs, and window-hatches can be seen as symbolic representations that add layers of meaning to the absurd and enigmatic events unfolding on stage.

1. Mirror: The mirror can be interpreted as a symbol of self-reflection and the characters' struggle to understand their true identities or the reality they find themselves in. It may also represent the distorted or fragmented view of oneself and the world around them.

2. Toy drum: The toy drum, often played by the menacing Goldberg, can be seen as a symbol of aggression, violence, and the impending threat that looms over the central character, Stanley. Its rhythmic beats may also signify the inexorable march of fate or the relentless passage of time.

3. Newspapers: The newspapers in the play can represent the characters' attempts to connect with the outside world or their desire to escape the claustrophobic confines of the boarding house. They may also symbolize the characters' need for routine and normalcy amidst the surreal events unfolding around them.

4. Breakfast: The breakfast scene, with its mundane details of fried bread and cups of tea, can be interpreted as a symbol of domestic routine and the illusion of normalcy that the characters cling to. It may also represent the characters' attempts to establish a sense of control or familiarity in an increasingly bizarre and threatening situation.

5. Chairs: The chairs in the play can symbolize the power dynamics and shifting allegiances among the characters. The act of sitting or standing, as well as the positioning of the chairs, may represent the characters' positions of dominance or submission within the power struggles that unfold.

6. Window-hatch: The window-hatch can be seen as a symbol of both confinement and the possibility of escape. It represents the characters' desire to break free from the oppressive atmosphere of the boarding house, while also highlighting the barriers and limitations that trap them within their respective realities.

  Overall, Pinter's use of these everyday objects serves to heighten the sense of absurdity and tension in the play, while also allowing for multiple symbolic interpretations that reflect the characters' psychological states, power dynamics, and the overarching themes of identity, isolation, and the human condition.


6. How effective are scenes like ‘Interrogation scene’ (Act 1), ‘Birthday Party scene’ (Act 2) and ‘Faltering Goldberg & Petey’s timid resistance scene’ (Act 3) captured in the movie?


>> "The Birthday Party" is a complex and layered play, and the effectiveness of its scenes can vary depending on the interpretation and execution by the director and actors. The 1968 film adaptation of "The Birthday Party" directed by William Friedkin is regarded as a faithful adaptation of Harold Pinter's play. Here's an evaluation of the effectiveness of the scenes you mentioned:

1. Interrogation Scene (Act 1):
   - This scene is pivotal in establishing the tone and atmosphere of the play. In the interrogation scene, Goldberg and McCann interrogate Stanley, gradually breaking down his defenses and instilling fear and paranoia in him.

   - Effectiveness: In the hands of skilled actors and a competent director, the interrogation scene can be highly effective in creating tension and unease. The claustrophobic setting, combined with the relentless questioning and psychological manipulation, can be incredibly gripping for the audience.

2. Birthday Party Scene (Act 2):
   - The birthday party scene is a key moment of contrast in the play. It follows the intense interrogation scene and presents a surreal and absurd tableau as Stanley's birthday celebration descends into chaos.

   - Effectiveness: This scene requires careful pacing and staging to capture the absurdity and dark humor inherent in Pinter's writing. The juxtaposition of seemingly mundane festivities with underlying tension and menace should be conveyed effectively to the audience to maintain the play's thematic coherence.

3. Faltering Goldberg & Petey's Timid Resistance Scene (Act 3):
   - In Act 3, Goldberg's facade of confidence begins to falter, and Petey shows a timid resistance to the intruders in his home. This scene further explores the power dynamics between the characters and the theme of conformity versus rebellion.

   - Effectiveness: The effectiveness of this scene hinges on the portrayal of Goldberg's unraveling and Petey's subtle defiance. The tension should build gradually as Goldberg's control slips, and Petey's resistance should be conveyed with nuance to highlight his internal conflict.

  Overall, the effectiveness of these scenes in the 1968 film adaptation of "The Birthday Party" would depend on various factors such as the quality of the screenplay adaptation, the performances of the actors, the direction, and the cinematography. If executed well, these scenes have the potential to capture the essence of Pinter's darkly comedic exploration of power, identity, and existential dread.


# Post Viewing Task:-

1. Why are two scenes of Lulu omitted from the movie?

>> In the 1968 film adaptation of Harold Pinter's play "The Birthday Party," directed by William Friedkin, two scenes featuring the character Lulu were omitted from the final cut. The decision to exclude these scenes likely stemmed from various factors related to pacing, narrative focus, and thematic coherence. The character of Lulu, while significant in the play for her interactions with the protagonist Stanley, might have been considered less essential to the cinematic adaptation's overall storyline. Furthermore, the exclusion of these scenes could have been a deliberate choice to streamline the film's plot and maintain its tension and ambiguity. Additionally, practical constraints such as runtime limitations or concerns about pacing may have influenced the decision to remove certain elements deemed non-essential to the central narrative. Overall, while the omission of Lulu's scenes may alter the dynamics of the story, it reflects the director's interpretation and vision for the film adaptation.


2. What do you read in 'newspaper' in the movie? Petey is reading newspaper to Meg, it torn into pieces by McCain, pieces are hidden by Petey in last scene.


>> In the film adaptation of "The Birthday Party," the newspaper takes on a symbolic role, carrying nuanced meanings throughout. Initially, when Petey reads the newspaper to Meg, it represents the ordinary act of consuming news, a seemingly mundane part of daily life. However, McCain's unexpected action of tearing the newspaper into shreds introduces a disruptive twist.

  The tearing of the newspaper can be interpreted as a symbol of the disruption or manipulation of information. It hints at unseen forces that may be altering or controlling the narrative presented in the news. This gesture introduces an aura of secrecy or suppression surrounding the content within the torn newspaper.

  Petey's decision to conceal the torn pieces in the final scene adds another layer of intrigue. It suggests a deliberate effort to withhold certain information, with the hidden fragments symbolizing obscured truths or suppressed facts.


3. Camera is positioned over the head of McCain when he is playing Blind Man's Buff and is positioned at the top with a view of room like a cage (trap) when Stanley is playing it. What interpretations can you give to these positioning of camera?

>> In "The Birthday Party" (1968), the differing camera positions during the scenes of McCain and Stanley playing Blind Man's Buff likely serve symbolic and thematic purposes:

1. Camera Over McCain's Head: Placing the camera over McCain's head during his game of Blind Man's Buff suggests a sense of vulnerability and disorientation. The high-angle shot creates a feeling of being watched or trapped, reflecting McCain's own feelings of being confined or manipulated. It could also symbolize his inability to see clearly or understand the true nature of his situation.

2. Room Viewed Like a Cage (Trap) with Stanley: When Stanley plays Blind Man's Buff, the camera positioning at the top with a view of the room resembling a cage or trap may symbolize his sense of entrapment within the confines of his own existence. This framing could represent Stanley's feeling of being trapped in a mundane or oppressive environment, unable to escape or find meaning in his life. Additionally, it might suggest a sense of surveillance or scrutiny, highlighting the tension and paranoia present in the film.

   Overall, these camera positions serve to enhance the themes of confinement, surveillance, and disorientation present in "The Birthday Party," providing visual cues to the audience about the characters' internal struggles and the oppressive atmosphere of the narrative.


4. Do you see any similarities among Kafka's Joseph K. (in 'The Trial'), Orwell's Winston Smith (in 'Nineteen Eighty-Four') and Pinter's Victor (in 'One for the Road')?

>>Each of these characters—Joseph K. from Franz Kafka's "The Trial," Winston Smith from George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four," and Victor from Harold Pinter's "One for the Road"—exemplifies a profound sense of powerlessness and existential struggle within oppressive systems. Joseph K. grapples with an inscrutable legal bureaucracy that ultimately controls his fate, Winston Smith navigates a totalitarian regime that monitors and suppresses individual expression, and Victor confronts the brutality of an authoritarian interrogation. Despite their distinct contexts, all three characters confront the dehumanizing forces of institutional control and face the existential dilemma of agency versus submission. Moreover, their narratives highlight the vulnerability of the individual in the face of systemic oppression, raising profound questions about freedom, autonomy, and the nature of power. Through these characters, Kafka, Orwell, and Pinter invite readers to contemplate the complexities of human existence within oppressive societies, resonating with timeless themes of existential angst and the struggle for autonomy.


Thank You for Reading...
Happy Learning...Exploring...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Midnight's Children (Th)

Greetings !! Everyone. This blog is part of a thinking activity based on "Midnight's Children," written by Salman Rushdie and ...